Skip to main content
Article
Twenty years of Assessment in WORK: A narrative review
WORK (2010)
  • Lynn Shaw, Dr., The University of Western Ontario
  • H. Campbell
  • K. Jacobs
  • B. Prodinger
Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this review was to gain an understanding of the first 20 years of contributions to WORK within the assessment domain and to reflect on the perspectives underscoring this knowledge base. Method: A narrative review of assessment articles using the WORK ARTicle database was conducted. Assessment articles were searched using issues from 1990 to 2009. Descriptive data was analyzed to examine historical trends of the specific types and dimensions of articles, the regional location of the contributions, and the methodological accordance. A reflective process was used by an editorial board member of WORK to inductively interpret perspectives and contextual issues that underpinned the evolution of the assessment domain in WORK. Results: Over half of N= 108 of the articles on assessment in WORK focused on establishing or reporting reliability and validity of assessments used in clinical practice or evaluation research. The majority of the assessment articles were predominantly focused on the person. Contributions of articles were from 5 regions: North America, Europe, Australia, Asia and Africa. Conclusions: Assessment articles in WORK have contributed to the development of evidence to support assessment of the worker. These articles represent a knowledge base that emphasizes evidence-based assessments to evaluate what a person can and cannot do to participate in work. Efforts are needed to expand knowledge generation in assessment to include more evaluations on the workplace and occupation dimensions, and that also considers the worker in context.

Publication Date
2010
Citation Information
Lynn Shaw, H. Campbell, K. Jacobs and B. Prodinger. "Twenty years of Assessment in WORK: A narrative review" WORK Vol. 35 (2010)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/drlynn/59/