Skip to main content
Article
Crop Residues: The Rest of the Story
Environmental Science & Technology
  • Douglas L. Karlen, United States Department of Agriculture
  • Rattan Lal, The Ohio State University
  • Ronald F. Follett, United States Department of Agriculture
  • John M. Kimble, Innovative Soil Solutions
  • Jerry L. Hatfield, United States Department of Agriculture
  • John A Miranowski, Iowa State University
  • Cynthia A. Cambardella, United States Department of Agriculture
  • Andrew Manale, Environmental Protection Agency
  • Robert P. Anex, Iowa State University
  • Charles W. Rice, Kansas State University
Document Type
Article
Publication Version
Published Version
Publication Date
9-1-2009
Publisher
American Chemical Society
DOI
10.1021/es9011004
Abstract

Synopsis In the February 15, 2009 issue of ES&T Strand and Benford argued that oceanic deposition of agricultural crop residues was a viable option for net carbon sequestration (43 [4], 1000−1007). In reviewing the calculations and bringing their experience to bear, Karlen et al. argue in this Viewpoint that crop residue oceanic permanent sequestration (CROPS) as envisioned by Strand and Benford will not work. They further propose alternative possibilities in agricultural methods to achieve a net decrease of CO2 emissions.

Comments

This article is from Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(21); 8011-8015. DOI: 10.1021/es9011004.

Rights
Works produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S. The content of this document is not copyrighted.
Language
en
File Format
application/pdf
Citation Information
Douglas L. Karlen, Rattan Lal, Ronald F. Follett, John M. Kimble, et al.. "Crop Residues: The Rest of the Story" Environmental Science & Technology Vol. 43 Iss. 21 (2009) p. 8011 - 8015
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/douglas_karlen/59/