Skip to main content
Article
Judicial Decision Making In the Supreme Court of Canada: Updating the Personal Attribute Model
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique
  • Donald R. Songer, University of South Carolina - Columbia
  • Susan W. Johnson, University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Publication Date
12-1-2007
Document Type
Article
Subject Area(s)
Political Science
Disciplines
Abstract
This study seeks to add to the current understanding of the political nature of the Supreme Court of Canada. We analyze a data set consisting of all nonunanimous published Supreme Court decisions for the period 1949 to 2000. A prior study by Tate and Sittiwong (1989) suggested a model of judge attributes for the period 1949 to 1985. We build on that analysis by extending the time period to 2000, which allows the impact of gender also to be assessed. We find that since the Court gained substantial docket control, the types of cases the Court hears has changed from the period studied by Tate and Sittiwong. In the more recent period, civil rights and liberties cases are much more substantial in number. We conclude some of the variables in the Tate and Sittiwong study may be time bound and we suggest a new model of attitudinal voting.
Citation Information
Donald R. Songer and Susan W. Johnson. "Judicial Decision Making In the Supreme Court of Canada: Updating the Personal Attribute Model" Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique Vol. 40 Iss. 4 (2007) p. 911 - 934
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/donald_songer/4/