![](https://d3ilqtpdwi981i.cloudfront.net/3Px70munYD28BPGteG2MbOJdNjE=/425x550/smart/https://bepress-attached-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/3c/43/09/3c4309d0-0663-4217-b681-e4d69237c6dd/thumbnail_ec13f7cf-168a-455f-b03c-cc25a531ed2b.jpg)
- Accounting and
- Business
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is two-fold: first, to examine whether the quality of accruals, as measured by accrual persistence, improved in the post-Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) period, and second, to examine the degree to which SOX-related improvement in accrual persistence varies across companies depending on the degree of their auditor's independence.
Design/methodology/approach – The paper compares accrual persistence in the pre- and post-SOX periods to test the first question. Then, partitioning on relative client importance as a measure of auditor independence, the paper compares the SOX-based improvement for clients of low and high independence audit firms.
Findings – The study first demonstrates that accrual persistence increased significantly in the post-SOX period. The study also finds evidence that in the post-SOX period, the subsample of companies audited by Big-N auditors with lower-independence experienced the greatest improvement in accrual persistence.
Originality/value – This is the first paper to evaluate SOX-related improvements in the quality of earnings as measured by accrual persistence. Prior studies test abnormal accruals and other earnings management metrics, however, persistence is a more general test of financial statement quality. This study also is the first to compare SOX-related improvements for clients of firms with differing levels of independence.