Skip to main content
Article
Defining and analyzing journalistic deception.
USF St. Petersburg campus Faculty Publications
  • Deni Elliott
  • Charles Culver
SelectedWorks Author Profiles:

Deni Elliott

Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1992
Abstract

Many journalists, readers and scholars exhibit confusion concerning the nature and justification of deception. In this article, we clarify those acts that should count as deception. Before discussing if any cases of deception can be construed as morally justified, we clarify which investigative, interrogative, and information-giving techniques are deceptive on their face. We also bracket borderline cases.

Comments
Citation only. Full-text article is available only through licensed access provided by the publisher. Published in Journal of Mass Media Ethics. 7(2), 69-84.
Language
en_US
Publisher
Routledge
Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
Citation Information
Elliott, D. & Culver, C. (1992). Defining and analyzing journalistic deception. Journal of Mass Media Ethics. 7(2), 69-84.