Skip to main content
Article
Tufts and the Evolution of Debt-Discharge Theory
Florida Tax Review
  • Deborah A Geier, Cleveland State University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-1992
Disciplines
Abstract
This 1992 article first explores how the concept of - 61(a)(12) debt-discharge income evolved over time from a "balance sheet improvement" rationale to one recognizing that what is properly measured under - 61(a)(12) is the prior receipt that would have been a wealth accession at that time if not for the absolute obligation to repay (without regard to balance sheet consequences). The article then goes on to explore how the Supreme Court created unnecessary mischief in Tufts v. Commissioner, 461 U.S. 300 (1983), by failing to recognize the critical differences between - 1001 "gain" or "loss" and - 61(a)(12) debt-discharge income.
Comments
Portions reprinted in Federal Income Tax Anthology, P. Caron, K. Burke, & G. McCough eds., Anderson Co. 1997
Citation Information
Deborah A. Geier, Tufts and the Evolution of Debt-Discharge Theory, 1 Florida Tax Review 115 (December 1992)