Skip to main content
Unpublished Paper
Engineering Crises: Favoritism and Strategic Fiscal Indiscipline
CEPR Discussion Paper No. 12291, September 2017. (2017)
  • GIlles Saint-Paul, Paris School of Economics
  • Davide Ticchi, Polytechnic University of Marche
  • Andrea Vindigni, University of Genoa
Abstract
    If people understand that some macroeconomic policies are unsustainable, why would they vote for them in the first place? We develop a political economy theory of the endogenous emergence of fiscal crises, based on the idea that the adjustment mechanism to a crisis favors some social groups, that may be induced ex-ante to vote in favor of policies that are more likely to lead to a crisis. People are entitled to a certain level of a publicly provided good, which may be rationed in times of crises. After voting on that level, society votes on the extend to which it will be financed by debt. Under bad enough macro shocks, a crisis arises: taxes are set at their maximum but despite that some agents do not get their entitlement. Some social groups do better in this rationing process than others. We show that public debt -- which makes crises more likely -- is higher, as is the probability of a crisis, the greater the level of favoritism. If the favored group is important enough to be pivotal when society votes on the entitlement level, favoritism also leads to greater public expenditure. We show that the favored group may strategically favor a weaker state in order to make crises more frequent. Finally, the decisive voter when choosing expenditure may be different from the one when voting on debt. In such a case, constitutional limits on debt may raise the utility of all the poor, relative to the equilibrium outcome absent such limits.
Keywords
  • Political Economy,
  • Fiscal Crises,
  • Favoritism,
  • Entitlements,
  • Public Debt,
  • Inequality,
  • State Capacity.
Publication Date
Summer September 11, 2017
Citation Information
Saint-Paul, Gilles, Ticchi, Davide and Vindigni, Andrea. “Engineering Crises: Favoritism and Strategic Fiscal Indiscipline.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 12291, September 2017.