Skip to main content
Article
Concrete Production Plant Variables Affecting Flexural Strength Relative to Compressive Strength
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
  • David Newton Richardson, Missouri University of Science and Technology
  • Brent Andrew Whitwell
Abstract
Some project specifications allow the substitution of compressive strength for flexural strength testing for the quality control of projects in which flexural strength is the critical type of strength, such as for pavements. There are certain errors during the production of concrete and aggregate in which the use of compressive strength quality control testing may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect significant changes in flexural strength. A survey of concrete production operations revealed that numerous production errors (variables) commonly occur in practice. Thirteen of these plant production variables were examined for their effects on changes in compressive strength relative to flexural strength. Combining the results of the present study with data reported from the literature indicated that compressive strength may be less sensitive than flexural strength to changes in aggregate particle shape and texture, gradation, maximum aggregate size, aggregate source mineralogy, mineral filler/dust content, deleterious material, and possibly aggregate coatings and water-cementitious material ratio. Thus, under certain conditions, it may be unconservative to use compressive strength testing in lieu of flexural strength testing for quality control.
Department(s)
Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering
Keywords and Phrases
  • Concrete,
  • Compressive Strength,
  • Flexural Strength,
  • Mixture Variables,
  • Quality Control
Document Type
Article - Journal
Document Version
Citation
File Type
text
Language(s)
English
Rights
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), All rights reserved.
Publication Date
8-1-2014
Citation Information
David Newton Richardson and Brent Andrew Whitwell. "Concrete Production Plant Variables Affecting Flexural Strength Relative to Compressive Strength" Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering Vol. 26 Iss. 8 (2014) ISSN: Print: 0899-1561; Electronic: 1943-5533
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/david_richardson/58/