Skip to main content
Presentation
Rules versus Standards: Competing Notions of Inconsistency Robustness in the Supreme Court and Federal Circuit
Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property Academic Conference (2011)
  • David S. Olson, Boston College Law School
Abstract
This Article applies a new paradigm from the field of computer science—Inconsistency Robustness Theory (IRT)—in order to analyze the competing ways in which the Supreme Court and Federal Circuit craft patent law standards and rules.
Publication Date
September 30, 2011
Citation Information
David S. Olson. "Rules versus Standards: Competing Notions of Inconsistency Robustness in the Supreme Court and Federal Circuit" Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property Academic Conference (2011)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/david_olson/32/