Skip to main content
Article
Evidence Contrary to the Statistical View of Boosting
Journal of Machine Learning Research (2008)
  • David Mease, San Jose State University
  • A. Wyner
Abstract

The statistical perspective on boosting algorithms focuses on optimization, drawing parallels with maximum likelihood estimation for logistic regression. In this paper we present empirical evidence that raises questions about this view. Although the statistical perspective provides a theoretical framework within which it is possible to derive theorems and create new algorithms in general contexts, we show that there remain many unanswered important questions. Furthermore, we provide examples that reveal crucial flaws in the many practical suggestions and new methods that are derived from the statistical view. We perform carefully designed experiments using simple simulation models to illustrate some of these flaws and their practical consequences.

Keywords
  • boosting algorithms,
  • LogitBoost,
  • AdaBoost
Publication Date
2008
Publisher Statement
Copyright © 2008 David Mease.
Citation Information
David Mease and A. Wyner. "Evidence Contrary to the Statistical View of Boosting" Journal of Machine Learning Research Vol. 9 (2008)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/david_mease/2/