![](https://d3ilqtpdwi981i.cloudfront.net/5TuU-vZe3bsp4gZ7p4LdFxHlW9w=/425x550/smart/https://bepress-attached-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2d/b9/93/2db9935b-7cd7-487d-a8f1-7659d1008937/thumbnail_730e78e9-361d-44e1-99a8-ba9580ce0f6a.jpg)
Article
Reply to "Comment on 'Recombination of Excitons Bound to Oxygen and Silicon Donors in Freestanding GaN' "
Physical Review B
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-1-2004
Disciplines
Abstract
In their Comment on our publication [Phys. Rev. B 66, 245317 (2002)], Freitas et al. criticize our identification of donor-bound exciton transitions and the analysis of two-electron satellite emission lines. We show that some arguments given in the Comment are in conflict with our time-resolved and magneto-optical data. We present a discussion of the intradonor transition energies and donor chemical shifts to avoid misunderstanding.
DOI
10.1103/PhysRevB.69.157302
Citation Information
A. Wysmolek, K. P. Korona, R. Stepniewski, J. M Baranowsky, et al.. "Reply to "Comment on 'Recombination of Excitons Bound to Oxygen and Silicon Donors in Freestanding GaN' "" Physical Review B Vol. 69 Iss. 15 (2004) ISSN: 1098-0121 Available at: http://works.bepress.com/david_look/44/
The original publication is available at http://prb.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v69/i15/e157302