CRES Programs for Legal EducationFaculty Scholarship
Document TypeWorking Paper
- legal instruction,
- essay questions
AbstractStudents complain that they do not get enough feedback on their progress through the year. Faculty members complain that students cannot write, although they often mean that students cannot analyze in writing. But mid-semester examinations are a pain to grade and often do not cover enough material to challenge students in recognizing the issues. Multiple choice examinations are weak choices for issue spotting, time consuming to construct, and offer no opportunity for writing. Most forms of examination grading do not really help the student understand exactly what they should be doing. Sample answers alone may or may not be read, but are likely not to be internalized. Wouldn’t it be nice if there were a mechanism for students to analyze multiple issues with complex answers that the instructor need not grade, but that gave the student feedback on their progress and tools to improve their analysis in the future?
Citation InformationDavid S. Bogen and Eric Sherbine. "CRES Programs for Legal Education" (2012)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/david_bogen/62/