Skip to main content
Article
Might versus Morality Explored: Motivational and Cognitive Bases for Social Motives
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1991)
  • David N. Sattler, Western Washington University
  • Norbert L. Kerr
Abstract
Two conceptual models for social motives that were suggested by the results of W. B. Liebrand et al (see record 1987-34399-001) were examined. A goal model suggests that social motive differences reflect differences in interpersonal relations such that cooperators strive for good or moral interpersonal relations, whereas individualists strive for favorable power relationships. A schema model suggests that social motive differences reflect differences in cognitive knowledge structures. Prescriptive message content and partner strategy were manipulated to test these models. The goal model predicted that the prescriptive message would affect behavior most when it was congruent with the S's own goals. The schema model predicted that a message consistent with S's schema would prime related elements of that schema and amplify the usual response to one's partner's strategy. The results generally supported the schema model for cooperators; neither model was supported for individualists.
Keywords
  • Prescriptive message content & partner strategy & cooperative vs individualistic social motive,
  • Social dilemma task performance,
  • College students,
  • Test of goal vs schema models
Disciplines
Publication Date
May, 1991
Citation Information
David N. Sattler and Norbert L. Kerr. "Might versus Morality Explored: Motivational and Cognitive Bases for Social Motives" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol. 60 Iss. 5 (1991) p. 756 - 765
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/david-sattler/39/