Skip to main content
Article
Associational Privacy, the Presumption of Innocence, and 'Corruption of Blood' as Constitutional Metaphors in the Debate on 'Familial Searching'
American Criminal Law Review Blog
  • David H. Kaye, Penn State Law
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-12-2012
Abstract
This essay analyzes three constitutional claims about the emerging practice of trawling DNA databases for “near misses” to crime-scene samples that might reflect the fact that the DNA came from a first-degree relative of the nearly matching (but excluded) individual. These claims are that this type of “outer-directed” trawling (which casts suspicion on individual outside the database) is an infringement of constitutionally protected familial privacy, an affront to the presumption of innocence, and an unconstitutional “corruption of blood.” Upon inspection, the relevant constitutional provisions lend no more than metaphorical support to these objections to “familial searching.”
Comments

This article was originally published on the American Criminal Law Review Blog, November 12, 2012.

Citation Information
David H. Kaye. "Associational Privacy, the Presumption of Innocence, and 'Corruption of Blood' as Constitutional Metaphors in the Debate on 'Familial Searching'" American Criminal Law Review Blog (2012)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/david-kaye/12/