Skip to main content
Article
Argumentative knowledge construction in asynchronous calculus discussion boards
Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education: SIGMAA on RUME (2022)
  • Zackery Reed, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide
  • Darryl Chamberlain, Jr., Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide
  • Karen Keene, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Abstract
Classroom discourse constitutes a fundamental activity in which learners can acquire knowledge. A multifaceted phenomenon, any enacted classroom discussion entails the enmeshment of social, cultural, curricular, and modality factors. Focusing specifically on discourse in the context of mathematical discussion activities in the asynchronous online modality, we propose use of Weinberger and Fischer’s (2006) Argumentative Knowledge Construction framework for design research. We contend that this framework, suitably amended to meet the particular needs of mathematics courses, may enable in-depth analysis of major dimensions of students’ knowledge construction as they engage in activities in an asynchronous modality. Research using this framework in the context of face-to-face mathematical learning (Keene, Williams, & McNeil, 2016) and in online settings in other disciplines (Schrire, 2006; Clark & Sampson, 2008; Dubovi & Tabak. 2020) has been reported.
Keywords
  • Calculus,
  • Knowledge Co-Construction,
  • Asynchronous Instruction,
  • Design Research
Publication Date
February, 2022
Citation Information
Reed, Z., Chamberlain Jr., D., & Keene, K. (2022, Feb 24-26). Argumentative knowledge construction in asynchronous calculus discussion boards. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education: SIGMAA on RUME, Boston, MA. URL: http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/RUME24.pdf.