Skip to main content
Article
The myth of 'scientific method' in contemporary educational research
Journal of Philosophy of Education
  • Darrell Patrick ROWBOTTOM, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom
  • Sarah Jane AISTON, University of Durham, United Kingdom
Document Type
Journal article
Publication Date
5-1-2006
Disciplines
Abstract
Whether educational research should employ the ‘scientific method’ has been a recurring issue in its history. Hence, textbooks on research methods continue to perpetuate the idea that research students ought to choose between competing camps: ‘positivist’ or ‘interpretivist’. In reference to one of the most widely referred to educational research methods textbooks on the market—namely Research Methods in Education by Cohen, Manion, and Morrison—this paper demonstrates (1) the misconception of science in operation and (2) the perversely false dichotomy that has become enshrined in educational research. It then advocates a new approach, and suggests that the fixation with ‘science’ versus ‘non-science’ is counterproductive, when what is actually required for good inquiry is a critical approach to knowledge claims.
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00508.x
E-ISSN
14679752
Publisher Statement

Copyright © 2006 Journal of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain

Access to external full text or publisher's version may require subscription.

Full-text Version
Publisher’s Version
Citation Information
Rowbottom, D. P., & Aiston, S. J. (2006). The myth of 'scientific method' in contemporary educational research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(2), 137-156. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00508.x