Article
TRIPS Pluralism
World Trade Review
(2021)
Abstract
The article explains that the interpretation of the TRIPS Agreement by WTO dispute-settlement panels and the Appellate Body has palpably shifted since the establishment of the WTO in 1995. Some of this shift is also arguably present in disputes concerning other WTO instruments. This progressive shift comes at a time when key debates about TRIPS waivers are taking place on the rue de Lausanne, namely a first for the COVID-19 pandemic and a second possible one for environmental protection measures related to climate change. According to the proposed pluralist analysis of TRIPS, it was less likely as of 2020 that the WTO dispute-settlement system would find unjustifiable inconsistencies between WTO commitments, on the one hand, and measures to protect public health or mitigate climate change, on the other hand. Whether future Appellate Body will follow that jurisprudence is an open question. Though the analysis contained in the article may make the COVID-related TRIPS waivers doctrinally unnecessary and allow Members to take measures now, its main aim is to inform the debates about the waivers and the future interpretation of the TRIPS Agreement, including the three-step test.
Keywords
- TRIPS Agreement,
- public health,
- waiver,
- pluralism,
- climate change,
- FCTC,
- FCCC
Disciplines
Publication Date
Fall October 27, 2021
DOI
10.1017/S1474745621000446
Citation Information
Daniel Gervais. "TRIPS Pluralism" World Trade Review Vol. 2021 (2021) p. 1 - 22 ISSN: 1474-7456 Available at: http://works.bepress.com/daniel_gervais/99/