Skip to main content
Article
Machine as Author.pdf
Iowa Law Review (2020)
  • Daniel Gervais
Abstract
The use of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) machines using deep 
learning neural networks to create material that facially looks like it should 
be protected by copyright is growing exponentially. From articles in national 
news media to music, film, poetry and painting, AI machines create material 
that has economic value and that competes with productions of human 
authors. The Article reviews both normative and doctrinal arguments for and 
against the protection by copyright of literary and artistic productions made 
by AI machines. The Article finds that the arguments in favor of protection 
are flawed and unconvincing and that a proper analysis of the history, 
purpose, and major doctrines of copyright law all lead to the conclusion that 
productions that do not result from human creative choices belong to the 
public domain. The Article proposes a test to determine which productions 
should be protected, including in case of collaboration between human and 
machine. Finally, the Article applies the proposed test to three specific fact 
patterns to illustrate its application. 
Keywords
  • artificial intelligence,
  • copyright,
  • authors,
  • creativity
Publication Date
Summer 2020
Citation Information
Daniel Gervais. "Machine as Author.pdf" Iowa Law Review Vol. 105 (2020) p. 2053 - 2016
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/daniel_gervais/102/