Skip to main content
Article
“Have we not an equal interest with the men of this nation?” Gender, Equality, and Genesis in John Locke's Political Thought
International Social Science Review
  • Daniel Skidmore-Hess, Georgia Southern University
  • Cathy Skidmore-Hess, Georgia Southern University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-1-2016
Abstract

It is the contention of this paper that a better understanding of Locke’s political theory can be gained by comparative study of his later religious text, The Reasonableness of Christianity alongside his Two Treatises of Civil Government. These texts contain notable parallels and contrasts which we describe in this article. Specifically, Locke’s critique of Robert Filmer’s patriarchalist theory of absolute monarchy both address the implications of the biblical Fall from an original state of human kind in the biblical account of the Garden of Eden. Locke’s account of natural human equality, including gender equality in his Second Treatise then relies upon his prior demolition of the claim that the Fall lead to the establishment of a legitimate form of political domination and this account is consistent with and effectively reinforced by the emphasis on free will in his later religious writings.

Citation Information
Daniel Skidmore-Hess and Cathy Skidmore-Hess. "“Have we not an equal interest with the men of this nation?” Gender, Equality, and Genesis in John Locke's Political Thought" International Social Science Review Vol. 92 Iss. 1 (2016) ISSN: 0278-2308
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/daniel-skidmore-hess/6/