Skip to main content
Article
Limitless borderless forgetfulness? Limiting the geographical reach of the ‘right to be forgotten'
Oslo Law Review
  • Dan Svantesson, Bond University
Date of this Version
1-1-2015
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Details

Published version

Svantesson, D. J. B. (2015). Limitless borderless forgetfulness? Limiting the geographical reach of the ‘right to be forgotten'. Oslo Law Review, 2 (2), 116-138.

Access the journal

2015 HERDC submission

© Copyright, Dan Svantesson, 2015

Distribution License
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Disciplines
Abstract

In Google Spain, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that, in certain circumstances, the operator of a search engine is obliged to remove search results from the list of results displayed following a search made on the basis of a person’s name. In respect of implementation of this ‘right to be forgotten’ – or more accurately ‘right to delisting’ – one of the most important issues relates to the geographical scope of the delisting; that is, once it is decided that certain search results should be delisted, what is the appropriate geographical scope of the delisting? Google is currently only delisting in relation to EU domains such as .es, .nl and .de. However, in sharp contrast, the EU’s Article 29 Working Party on data protection wants global blocking so as to ensure that EU law is not ‘circumvented’. This article canvasses the contours of this issue and attempts to advance its resolution by proposing a Model Code for Determining the Geographical Scope of Delisting Under the Right To Delisting. While the Model is presented in the EU context, it can easily be transplanted into other jurisdictions as well.

Citation Information
Dan Svantesson. "Limitless borderless forgetfulness? Limiting the geographical reach of the ‘right to be forgotten'" Oslo Law Review Vol. 2 Iss. 2 (2015) p. 116 - 138 ISSN: 2387-3299
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/dan_svantesson/86/