Skip to main content
Article
Extraterritoriality and targeting in EU data privacy law: The weak spot undermining the regulation
International Data Privacy Law
  • Dan Svantesson, Bond University
Date of this Version
9-27-2015
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Details

Citation only

Svantesson, D. J. B. (2015). Extraterritoriality and targeting in EU data privacy law: The weak spot undermining the regulation. International Data Privacy Law, 5(4), 226-234.

Access the journal

2015 HERDC submission

© Copyright, The Author, 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Disciplines
Abstract

Key Points

•This article aims to highlight that the conventional focus on distinguishing between territorial jurisdiction and extraterritorial jurisdiction is misguided.

•It also analyses the latest legal developments as to Article 4—which deals with the territorial scope—of the European Data Protection Directive as well as the latest version of its counterpart (Article 3) in the proposed European Data Protection Regulation.

•It will be shown that the direction the EU is taking—focusing on ‘targeting’—requires substantial refinement to avoid ending in frustration; the benefits of the ‘targeting’ test as currently articulated are largely illusory, and the severity of its downsides will no doubt become clear once we see it applied in practice in the data privacy context.

Citation Information
Dan Svantesson. "Extraterritoriality and targeting in EU data privacy law: The weak spot undermining the regulation" International Data Privacy Law Vol. 5 Iss. 4 (2015) p. 226 - 234 ISSN: 2044-4001
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/dan_svantesson/101/