Skip to main content
Article
Analysis of Eddy Current: What Can Be Done to Reduce the Number of False Positives and False Negatives Made by Human Operators in Nondestructive Testing?
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2018)
  • Yasmin Arbab, San Jose State University
  • Dan Nathan-Roberts, San Jose State University
Abstract
This work identifies the potential for improving the reliability of nondestructive testing (NDT) in the aviation industry. This particular work is focused on a piece of equipment called eddy current scanner and specifically investigates how this instrument, used to detect cracks on aircraft components, could be improved to better fit human needs and capabilities. Current research shows us that Type I and Type II errors, also known as false negatives and false positives, made by operators of the eddy current are in part due to workspace conditions, physical positioning, and mental states greatly affecting the amount of cognitive resources left available to perform a job accurately and reliably. Potential solutions that are within the realm of eddy current’s design and possible enhancements are presented.
Publication Date
September 1, 2018
DOI
10.1177/1541931218621339
Publisher Statement
SJSU users: use the following link to login and access the article via SJSU databases.
Citation Information
Yasmin Arbab and Dan Nathan-Roberts. "Analysis of Eddy Current: What Can Be Done to Reduce the Number of False Positives and False Negatives Made by Human Operators in Nondestructive Testing?" Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Vol. 62 Iss. 1 (2018) p. 1499 - 1503
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/dan_nathan-roberts/18/