Skip to main content
Article
A Comparison of Covert and Videotape Modeling Strategies for Training Complex Mechanical Assembly Tasks
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
  • Peter J.N. Linnerooth, Minnesota State University - Mankato
  • Daniel Houlihan, Minnesota State University - Mankato
  • Melissa A. Lenz, Minnesota State University - Mankato
  • Jeffrey Buchanan, Minnesota State University - Mankato
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-1-2014
Abstract

Experimentation was conducted comparing videotape self-modeling and videotape peer/other modeling to self-directed mental rehearsal (a covert modeling procedure) and a no-training (physical practice) control condition in training a mechanical device assembly task. Eighty male and female college students were introduced to the assembly task in a timed pretest trial and then videotaped performing the assembly task in a second trial. Over the next 4 days, subjects were randomly assigned to training conditions and repeatedly trained and tested in the mechanical device assembly task. The effects of training methods upon assembly times, self-efficacy expectations regarding assembly task performance, and subjective impressions of the nature and usefulness of training were examined. Superior assembly performance over initial training and at 4 months post-training follow-up was observed for the self-directed mental rehearsal training condition and discussed.

DOI
10.1177/1555343414532101
Citation Information
Linnerooth, P.J.N., Houlihan, D., Lenz, M., & Buchanan, J.A. (2014). A Comparison of Covert and Videotape Modeling Strategies for Training Complex Mechanical Assembly Tasks. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 8 (3), 203-218. DOI. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1555343414532101