Skip to main content
Determining the pattern of community care: is coresidence more important than caregiver relationship
Women’s Health Research Faculty Publications
  • S L Tennstedt
  • Sybil L. Crawford, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • John B. McKinlay, New England Research Institutes
UMMS Affiliation
New England Research Institute
Publication Date
Document Type
Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; *Caregivers; Community Health Services; *Family; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Forecasting; *Frail Elderly; Health Services for the Aged; *Housing; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Marital Status; Middle Aged; Self Care; Sex Factors; Social Environment; Social Support
Researchers have previously emphasized the importance of kinship tie to explaining the pattern of care received by a disabled elder. For example, it has been argued that spouses are a distinct group of caregivers, i.e., they provide more care with less help from others and experience more stress. However, based on the theory of primary group structures and functions, this study hypothesized that coresidence rather than the kinship tie is more important in determining the pattern of caregiving. When spouses are compared to other coresiding caregivers, patterns of informal care and use of formal services are similar. Variance in amounts of informal care is explained by elder gender and frailty level rather than by caregiver relationship. Similarly, level of frailty was the only important predictor of use of formal services.
J Gerontol. 1993 Mar;48(2):S74-83.
Related Resources
Link to article in PubMed
PubMed ID
Citation Information
S L Tennstedt, Sybil L. Crawford and John B. McKinlay. "Determining the pattern of community care: is coresidence more important than caregiver relationship" Vol. 48 Iss. 2 (1993) ISSN: 0022-1422 (Print)
Available at: