Skip to main content
Article
Does the peer-led Honest, Open, Proud program reduce stigma’s impact for everyone? An individual participant data meta-regression analysis
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
  • Thomas Klein, Universitat Ulm
  • Markus Kösters, Technische Universitat Dresden
  • Patrick W Corrigan, Illinois Institute of Technology
  • Winnie W.S. Mak, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Lindsay Sheehan, Illinois Institute of Technology
  • Colleen Conley, Loyola University Chicago
  • Nathalie Oexle, Universitat Ulm
  • Nicolas Rüsch, Universitat Ulm
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-9-2023
Pages
1-11
Publisher Name
Springer
Disciplines
Abstract

Purpose

Many people with mental illness experience self-stigma and stigma-related stress and struggle with decisions whether to disclose their condition to others. The peer-led Honest, Open, Proud (HOP) group program supports them in their disclosure decisions. In randomized controlled trials, HOP has shown positive effects on self-stigma and stigma stress on average. This study examined individual predictors of HOP outcomes and tested the hypothesis that stigma stress reduction at the end of HOP mediates positive HOP effects at follow-up. Methods

Six RCTs were included with data at baseline, post (after the HOP program) and at 3- or 4-week follow-up. Baseline variables were entered in meta-regression models to predict change in self-stigma, stigma stress, depressive symptoms and quality of life among HOP participants. Mediation models examined change in stigma stress (post) as a mediator of HOP effects on self-stigma, depressive symptoms, and quality of life at follow-up. Results

More shame at baseline, and for some outcomes reduced empowerment, predicted reduced HOP effects on stigma stress, self-stigma, depressive symptoms, and quality of life. Younger age was related to greater improvements in stigma stress after the HOP program. Stigma stress reductions at the end of HOP mediated positive effects on self-stigma, depressive symptoms and quality of life at follow-up. Conclusion

Participants who are initially less burdened by shame may benefit more from HOP. Stigma stress reduction could be a key mechanism of change that mediates effects on more distal outcomes. Implications for the further development of HOP are discussed.

Comments

Author Posting © The Authors, 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The article was published in Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, May 2023, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-023-02491-3.

Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Citation Information
Thomas Klein, Markus Kösters, Patrick W Corrigan, Winnie W.S. Mak, et al.. "Does the peer-led Honest, Open, Proud program reduce stigma’s impact for everyone? An individual participant data meta-regression analysis" Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (2023)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/colleen_conley/33/