Skip to main content
Article
Classification for Animal Vocal Fold Surgery: Resection Margins Impact Histological Outcomes of Vocal Fold Injury
Laryngoscope
  • Mitsuyoshi Imaizumi, University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Susan L. Thibeault, University of Wisconsin - Madison
  • Ciara Leydon, Sacred Heart University
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
11-1-2014
Abstract

Objective—Extent of vocal fold injury impacts the nature and timing of wound healing, and voice outcomes. However, depth and extent of the lesion created to study wound healing in animal models vary across studies, likely contributing to different outcomes. Our goal was to create a surgery classification system to enable comparison of postoperative outcomes across animal vocal fold wound healing studies.

Study design—Prospective, controlled animal study.

Methods—Rats underwent one of three types of unilateral vocal fold surgeries classified by depth and length of resection. The surgeries were a subepithelial injury, resection of epithelium and superficial layer of the lamina propria at the midmembranous portion of the vocal fold; transmucosal injury, resection of epithelium and lamina propria; and transmuscular injury, resection of epithelium, lamina propria and superficial portion of the vocalis muscle Wound healing was evaluated histologically at various time points up to 35 days post-injury.

Results—Complete healing occurred by 14 days post-surgery for subepithelial injury and by day 35 for transmucosal injury. Injury remained present at day 35 for transmuscular injury.

Conclusions—Timing and completeness of healing varied by extent and depth of resection. Scarless healing occurred rapidly following subepithelial injury, while scarring was observed at five weeks after transmuscular injury. The proposed classification system may facilitate comparison of surgical outcomes across vocal fold wound healing studies.

Comments

At the time this article was written Ciara Leydon was affiliated with University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Version posted is the authors' HHS Public Access Author manuscript. Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.

DOI
10.1002/lary.24799
PMID
24965969
Publisher
Wiley
Pages
E437–E444
Citation Information

Published in final edited form as:

Imaizumi, M., Thibeault, S. L., & Leydon, C. (2014). Classification for animal vocal fold surgery: Resection margins impact histological outcomes of vocal fold injury. Laryngoscope, 124(11): E437–E444. Doi:10.1002/lary.24799.