Skip to main content
Article
Factors associated with inadequate colorectal cancer screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy
Family Medicine and Community Health Publications and Presentations
  • Adeyinka O. Laiyemo, Howard University
  • Chyke A. Doubeni, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Paul F. Pinsky, National Institutes of Health
  • V. Paul Doria-Rose, National Institutes of Health
  • Andrew K Sanderson, II, Howard University College of Medicine
  • Robert Bresalier, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
  • Joel Weissfeld, University of Pittsburgh
  • Robert E. Schoen, University of Pittsburgh
  • Pamela M. Marcus, National Institutes of Health
  • Phillip C. Prorok, National Institutes of Health
  • Christine D. Berg, National Institutes of Health
UMMS Affiliation
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health; Meyers Primary Care Institute
Publication Date
8-1-2012
Document Type
Article
Subjects
Colorectal Neoplasms; Early Detection of Cancer; Sigmoidoscopy
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Inadequate colorectal cancer screening wastes limited endoscopic resources. We examined patients factors associated with inadequate flexible sigmoidoscopy (FSG) screening at baseline screening and repeat screening 3-5 years later in 10 geographically-dispersed screening centers participating in the ongoing Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. METHODS: A total of 64,554 participants (aged 55-74) completed baseline questionnaires and underwent FSG at baseline. Of these, 39,385 participants returned for repeat screening. We used logistic regression models to assess factors that are associated with inadequate FSG (defined as a study in which the depth of insertion of FSG was <50 cm or visual inspection was limited to <90% of the mucosal surface but without detection of a polyp or mass). RESULTS: Of 7084 (11%) participants with inadequate FSG at baseline, 6496 (91.7%) had <50 cm depth of insertion (75.3% due to patient discomfort) and 500 (7.1%) participants had adequate depth of insertion but suboptimal bowel preparation. Compared to 55-59 year age group, advancing age in 5-year increments (odds ratios (OR) from 1.08 to 1.51) and female sex (OR = 2.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.27-2.54) were associated with inadequate FSG. Obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m(2)) was associated with reduced odds (OR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.62-0.72). Inadequate FSG screening at baseline was associated with inadequate FSG at repeat screening (OR = 6.24; 95% CI: 5.78-6.75). CONCLUSIONS: Sedation should be considered for patients with inadequate FSG or an alternative colorectal cancer screening method should be recommended.
DOI of Published Version
10.1016/j.canep.2011.10.013
Source

Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Aug;36(4):395-9. Epub 2011 Nov 22. Link to article on publisher's site

Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMed
PubMed ID
22112544
Citation Information
Adeyinka O. Laiyemo, Chyke A. Doubeni, Paul F. Pinsky, V. Paul Doria-Rose, et al.. "Factors associated with inadequate colorectal cancer screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy" Vol. 36 Iss. 4 (2012) ISSN: 1877-7821 (Linking)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/chyke_doubeni/26/