Employee recruiting sources and post-hire outcomes for job applicants and new hires: A test of two hypothesesJournal of Applied Psychology (1993)
In this study, unlike most recruitment source research, we tested for and ruled out the contaminating effects of prescreening and self-selection bias by examining applicants and new hires for nursing positions (Rynes & Barber, 1990). Consistent with the predictions of Rees (1966) and Ullman (1966), recruitment sources reached differently qualified applicants in terms of nursing experience and education which, in turn, were valid predictors of subsequent nurse performance. In a similar manner, recruitment sources produced sharply different levels of prehire knowledge, which was inversely related to voluntary turnover after 1 year. However, contrary to both hypotheses, prehire knowledge, education, and experience did not mediate the relationship between recruitment sources and posthire outcomes. Recruitment sources with greater prehire knowledge did not always result in lower voluntary turnover. Likewise, despite recruitment source differences in nursing experience and education, recruitment sources were not related to nursing performance. Finally, the extent to which applicants use multiple recruitment sources was investigated, and the methodological problem that this creates for recruitment source research was discussed. Note: Link is to the article in a subscription database available to users affiliated with Butler University. Appropriate login information will be required for access. Users not affiliated with Butler University should contact their local librarian for assistance in locating a copy of this article.
Citation Information"Employee recruiting sources and post-hire outcomes for job applicants and new hires: A test of two hypotheses" Journal of Applied Psychology Vol. 74 Iss. 2 (1993)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/chuck_williams/4/