Skip to main content
Article
When less is more: validating a brief scale to rate interprofessional team competencies
Medical Education Online (2017)
  • Desiree Lie
  • Regina Richter-Lagha
  • Christopher Forest, California State University, Monterey Bay
  • Anne Walsh
  • Kevin Lohenry
Abstract
There is a need for validated and easy-to-apply behavior-based tools for assessing interprofessional team competencies in clinical settings. The seven-item observer-based Modified McMaster-Ottawa scale was developed for the Team Objective Structured Clinical Encounter (TOSCE) to assess individual and team performance in interprofessional patient encounters.
We aimed to improve scale usability for clinical settings by reducing item numbers while maintaining generalizability; and to explore the minimum number of observed cases required to achieve modest generalizability for giving feedback.
The four-item Modified McMaster-Ottawa scale for assessing individual performance in interprofessional teams retains the generalizability and validity of the seven-item scale. Observation of students in teams interacting with two different patients provides reasonably reliable ratings for giving feedback. The four-item scale has potential for assessing individual student skills and the impact of IPE curricula in clinical practice settings.
Keywords
  • Interprofessional education,
  • IPE,
  • Standardized Patient,
  • TOSCE
Publication Date
January, 2017
DOI
10.1080/10872981.2017.1314751
Citation Information
Desiree Lie, Regina Richter-Lagha, Christopher Forest, Anne Walsh, et al.. "When less is more: validating a brief scale to rate interprofessional team competencies" Medical Education Online Vol. 22 Iss. 1 (2017) p. 1314751 - 1314751
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/christopher-forest/40/