Skip to main content
Article
On the relationship between solution strategies in two mental rotation tasks
Learning and Individual Differences
  • Christian Geiser, Utah State University
  • Anne B. Janssen, Freie Universität Berlin
Document Type
Article
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
10-1-2010
DOI
10.1016/j.lindif.2010.03.002
Abstract
Individual differences in solution strategies have frequently been reported for different measures of mental rotation (MR) ability. In the present study (N= 346 German students), we investigated the relationship between solution strategies on two tests commonly used to identify different patterns of strategies: the Mental Rotations Test (MRT; Vandenberg & Kuse, 1978; Peters, Laeng, Lathan, Jackson, Zaiouna, & Richardson, 1995) and the Cube Comparison Test (CCT; Amthauer, 1953; Amthauer, Brocke, Liepmann, & Beauducel, 2001). The results revealed high convergent validity of the solution strategy assignment. Individuals using analytic (holistic) strategies on the MRT tended to use analytic (holistic) strategies also on the CCT. More females than males were identified as users of analytic solution strategies on the MRT. In addition, males tended to generally show a faster performance than did females. Our findings suggest that solution strategies in MR generalize across different tasks and are not an artifact of a particular test
Citation Information
Christian Geiser and Anne B. Janssen. "On the relationship between solution strategies in two mental rotation tasks" Learning and Individual Differences Vol. 20 (2010) p. 473 - 478
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/christian-geiser/41/