Skip to main content
Article
Ring test evaluation of the detection of influenza A virus in swine oral fluids by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and virus isolation
The Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research
  • Christa K. Goodell, Iowa State University
  • Jianqiang Zhang, Iowa State University
  • Erin Strait, Iowa State University
  • Karen Harmon, Iowa State University
  • Devi Patnayak, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
  • Tracy Otterson, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
  • Marie Culhane, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
  • Jane Christopher-Hennings, South Dakota State University
  • Travis Clement, South Dakota State University
  • Pamela Leslie-Steen, South Dakota State University
  • Richard Hesse, Kansas State University
  • Joe Anderson, Kansas State University
  • Kevin Skarbek, Kansas State University
  • Amy Vincent, United States Department of Agriculture
  • Pravina Kitikoon, United States Department of Agriculture
  • Sabrina Swenson, United States Department of Agriculture
  • Melinda Jenkins-Moore, United States Department of Agriculture
  • Jodi McGill, United States Department of Agriculture
  • Rolf Rauh, Tetracore
  • William Nelson, Tetracore
  • Catherine O'Connell, Thermo Fisher Scientific
  • Rohn Shah, Thermo Fisher Scientific
  • Chong Wang, Iowa State University
  • Rodger Main, Iowa State University
  • Jeffery J. Zimmerman, Iowa State University
Document Type
Article
Publication Version
Published Version
Publication Date
1-1-2016
Abstract

The probability of detecting influenza A virus (IAV) in oral fluid (OF) specimens was calculated for each of 13 assays based on real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) and 7 assays based on virus isolation (VI). The OF specimens were inoculated with H1N1 or H3N2 IAV and serially diluted 10-fold (10(-1) to 10(-8)). Eight participating laboratories received 180 randomized OF samples (10 replicates × 8 dilutions × 2 IAV subtypes plus 20 IAV-negative samples) and performed the rRT-PCR and VI procedure(s) of their choice. Analysis of the results with a mixed-effect logistic-regression model identified dilution and assay as variables significant (P < 0.0001) for IAV detection in OF by rRT-PCR or VI. Virus subtype was not significant for IAV detection by either rRT-PCR (P = 0.457) or VI (P = 0.101). For rRT-PCR the cycle threshold (Ct) values increased consistently with dilution but varied widely. Therefore, it was not possible to predict VI success on the basis of Ct values. The success of VI was inversely related to the dilution of the sample; the assay was generally unsuccessful at lower virus concentrations. Successful swine health monitoring and disease surveillance require assays with consistent performance, but significant differences in reproducibility were observed among the assays evaluated.

Comments

This article is from The Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 80 (2016); 12

Rights
Works produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S. The content of this document is not copyrighted.
Language
en
File Format
application/pdf
Citation Information
Christa K. Goodell, Jianqiang Zhang, Erin Strait, Karen Harmon, et al.. "Ring test evaluation of the detection of influenza A virus in swine oral fluids by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and virus isolation" The Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research Vol. 80 Iss. 1 (2016) p. 12 - 20
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/chong-wang/33/