Skip to main content
Article
Has Time Expired for Time-Out Rooms?
School Business Affairs
  • Charles J. Russo, University of Dayton
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2014
Abstract

An issue that continues to raise serious concerns for education leaders surrounds the treatment of students with disabilities who behave unacceptably. In Honig v. Doe (1988), the Supreme Court acknowledged that in such cases, among the procedures available to educators is “the use of study carrels, timeouts, detention, or the restriction of privileges” (p. 325). Time-out rooms—typically small rooms where students who misbehave are sent until they can safely regain their composure—continue to be used in most jurisdictions, subject to state oversight via statutes and regulations (U.S. Department of Education 2010).

Inclusive pages
35-37
ISBN/ISSN
0036-651X
Document Version
Published Version
Comments

This document has been made available for download by permission of the publisher.

This article originally appeared in the January 2014 School Business Affairs magazine and is reprinted with permission of the Association of School Business Officials International (ASBO). The text herein does not necessarily represent the views or policies of ASBO International, and use of this imprint does not imply any endorsement or recognition by ASBO International and its officers or affiliates. Any additional re-purposing or reprint of this article in this or any other medium is restricted without prior written consent.

Permission documentation is on file.

Publisher
Association of School Business Officials
Place of Publication
Reston, VA
Citation Information
Charles J. Russo. "Has Time Expired for Time-Out Rooms?" School Business Affairs Vol. 80 Iss. 1 (2014)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/charles_russo/88/