Skip to main content
Article
A Cautionary Tale of Collective Bargaining in Public Education: A Teacher's Right or Tail Wagging the Dog?
University of Dayton Law Review
  • Charles J. Russo, University of Dayton
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-1-2012
Abstract

Beyond terms and conditions of employment, topics such as salaries and fringe benefits, issues that, again, were central in Wisconsin and Ohio, courts agree that an array of topics are subject to mandatory negotiations. ...

Put another way, Wisconsin led the way as the first state to mandate negotiations for public sector employees, including teachers, while also being the initial jurisdiction to enact reforms aimed at limiting the scope of unions and collective bargaining. ...

The fact that the attempted recall of Walker failed aside, such a strategy raises a question about the power of unions who represent a minority of residents in Wisconsin to impact state and local economies as well as the political process as a whole. ...

The final two sections of this Article reflect on the controversies about the scope and parameters of collective bargaining between public school teachers and their boards in Wisconsin and Ohio, using developments in these two states as a springboard to an examination of the larger picture concerning education labor relations.

Inclusive pages
317-349
ISBN/ISSN
0162-9174
Document Version
Published Version
Comments

The document available for download is provided with the permission of the author and the University of Dayton Law Review.

Publisher
University of Dayton Law Review
Peer Reviewed
Yes
Citation Information
Charles J. Russo. "A Cautionary Tale of Collective Bargaining in Public Education: A Teacher's Right or Tail Wagging the Dog?" University of Dayton Law Review Vol. 37 Iss. 3 (2012)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/charles_russo/41/