Skip to main content
Article
Tests of competency to consent to treatment
Systems and Psychosocial Advances Research Center Publications and Presentations
  • Loren H. Roth, University of Pittsburgh
  • Alan Meisel, University of Pittsburgh
  • Charles W. Lidz, University of Massachusetts Medical School
UMMS Affiliation
Department of Psychiatry
Date
3-1-1977
Document Type
Article
Medical Subject Headings
Adult; Awareness; Cognition; Decision Making; Female; Humans; *Informed Consent; Jurisprudence; Mental Disorders; *Mentally Ill Persons; Middle Aged; Personal Autonomy; Risk; *Risk Assessment; United States; ILL
Abstract
The authors describe the various tests of competency to consent to treatment used today, which include the following: 1)evidencing a choice, 2)"reasonable" outcome of choice, 3)choice based on "rational" reasons, 4)ability to understand, and 5)actual understanding. They analyze the applicability of these tests to patients' decisions to accept or refuse psychiatric treatment and illustrate the problems of ap-lying these tests by citing clinical case examples. They find that the circumstances in which competency becomes an issue determine which elements of which tests are stressed and which are underplayed.
Rights and Permissions
Citation: Am J Psychiatry. 1977 Mar;134(3):279-84.
Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMed
PubMed ID
842704
Citation Information
Loren H. Roth, Alan Meisel and Charles W. Lidz. "Tests of competency to consent to treatment" Vol. 134 Iss. 3 (1977) ISSN: 0002-953X (Linking)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/charles_lidz/11/