Skip to main content
Presentation
The Construct Validity of the Comparison Question Test for Physiological Deception Detection
Rocky Mountain Psychological Association: 86th Annual Convention, [Denver, CO] (2016)
  • Charles R. Honts, Boise State University
  • Rachael Reavy, Pennsylvania State University
Abstract
We analyzed the debriefings of 250 participants of a mock-crime experiment of the Comparison Question Test (CQT) in an effort to distinguish competing explanatory constructs. Innocent participants accurately perceived themselves as reacting more to comparison questions. Tese results fail to support emotion-based explanations but support cognitive load explanations.
Disciplines
Publication Date
April 15, 2016
Citation Information
Charles R. Honts and Rachael Reavy. "The Construct Validity of the Comparison Question Test for Physiological Deception Detection" Rocky Mountain Psychological Association: 86th Annual Convention, [Denver, CO] (2016)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/charles_honts/62/