Skip to main content
Fixed, Free, and Fixed: The Fickle Phylogeny of Extant Crinoidea (Echinodermata) and Their Permian-Triassic Origin
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
  • Greg W. Rouse, Scripps Institution of Oceanography
  • Lars S. Jermiin, CSIRO Ecosystem Science - Canberra, Australia; University of Sydney - Australia
  • Nerida G. Wilson, Australian Museum - Sydney
  • Igor Eeckhaut, University of Mons - Belgium
  • Deborah Lanterbecq, University of Mons - Belgium
  • Tatsuo Oji, Nagoya University - Japan
  • Craig M. Young, Oregon Institute of Marine Biology
  • Teena Browning, Department of Climate Change- Canberra, Australia
  • Paula Cisternas, The University of Sydney - Australia
  • Lauren E. Helgen, Smithsonian Institution
  • Michelle Stuckey, CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences - Canberra, Australia
  • Charles G. Messing, Nova Southeastern University
Document Type
Publication Date
  • Articulata,
  • Molecular clock,
  • Fossils,
  • Transformations
Although the status of Crinoidea (sea lilies and featherstars) as sister group to all other living echinoderms is well-established, relationships among crinoids, particularly extant forms, are debated. All living species are currently placed in Articulata, which is generally accepted as the only crinoid group to survive the Permian–Triassic extinction event. Recent classifications have recognized five major extant taxa: Isocrinida, Hyocrinida, Bourgueticrinina, Comatulidina and Cyrtocrinida, plus several smaller groups with uncertain taxonomic status, e.g., Guillecrinus, Proisocrinus and Caledonicrinus. Here we infer the phylogeny of extant Crinoidea using three mitochondrial genes and two nuclear genes from 59 crinoid terminals that span the majority of extant crinoid diversity. Although there is poor support for some of the more basal nodes, and some tree topologies varied with the data used and mode of analysis, we obtain several robust results. Cyrtocrinida, Hyocrinida, Isocrinida are all recovered as clades, but two stalked crinoid groups, Bourgueticrinina and Guillecrinina, nest among the featherstars, lending support to an argument that they are paedomorphic forms. Hence, they are reduced to families within Comatulida. Proisocrinus is clearly shown to be part of Isocrinida, and Caledonicrinus may not be a bourgueticrinid. Among comatulids, tree topologies show little congruence with current taxonomy, indicating that much systematic revision is required. Relaxed molecular clock analyses with eight fossil calibration points recover Articulata with a median date to the most recent common ancestor at 231–252 mya in the Middle to Upper Triassic. These analyses tend to support the hypothesis that the group is a radiation from a small clade that passed through the Permian–Triassic extinction event rather than several lineages that survived. Our tree topologies show various scenarios for the evolution of stalks and cirri in Articulata, so it is clear that further data and taxon sampling are needed to recover a more robust phylogeny of the group.

©2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Additional Comments
NSF grant #s: DEB1036368, DEB1036219; Australian Research Council grant #s: A10009136, DP0452173
Citation Information
Rouse, Greg W., Lars S. Jermiin, Nerida G. Wilson, Igor Eeckhaut, Deborah Lanterbecq, Tatsuo Oji, Craig M. Young et al. "Fixed, free, and fixed: The fickle phylogeny of extant Crinoidea (Echinodermata) and their Permian–Triassic origin." Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 66, no. 1 (2013): 161-181.