Skip to main content
Article
The '16-hour rule': a giant step, but in which direction
University of Massachusetts Medical School Faculty Publications
  • Joel H. Popkin, St. Vincent Hospital
  • Khaled E. Eissa, Tulane University Health Sciences Center
  • Kathleen M. Mazor, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Celeste A. Lemay, University of Massachusetts Medical School
UMMS Affiliation
Meyers Primary Care Institute; Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine
Publication Date
8-1-2015
Document Type
Article
Subjects
Adult; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Internship and Residency; Male; Patient Care; *Quality of Health Care; Surveys and Questionnaires; United States; *Work Schedule Tolerance
Disciplines
Abstract

The purpose of our study is to examine postgraduate year PGY-1 resident perceptions of educational and patient care experiences in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) through a survey of 2 groups completing a first year of training before and after the 16-hour rule change.

DOI of Published Version
10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.04.022
Source
Am J Med. 2015 Aug;128(8):922-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.04.022. Epub 2015 May 14. Link to article on publisher's site
Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMed
PubMed ID
25981692
Citation Information
Joel H. Popkin, Khaled E. Eissa, Kathleen M. Mazor and Celeste A. Lemay. "The '16-hour rule': a giant step, but in which direction" Vol. 128 Iss. 8 (2015) ISSN: 0002-9343 (Linking)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/celeste_lemay/40/