Skip to main content
Article
State Action That Penalizes Children as Evidence of a Desire to Harm Politically Unpopular Parents
Suffolk University Law Review
  • Catherine E. Smith, Washington and Lee University School of Law
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2018
Abstract

This Article is the first to advance the position that when the government takes the extreme step of denying children basic rights and benefits because of their parents, such state action should be recognized not just as evidence of animus against the children, but also as evidence of "a bare desire to harm" their "politically unpopular" parents. Identifying this type of government motivation and calling it what it is--animus toward parents--is just as important as condemning animus against the children themselves. Anti-parent animus that motivates harmful government behavior towards children should be prohibited as an impermissible means to accomplish an end and viewed as antithetical to our equal protection values.

Citation Information
Catherine E. Smith, State Action That Penalizes Children as Evidence of a Desire to Harm Politically Unpopular Parents, 51 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 439 (2018).