Skip to main content
Article
The art and science of searching MEDLINE to answer clinical questions. Finding the right number of articles
Quantitative Health Sciences Publications and Presentations
  • Jeroan J. Allison, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Catarina I. Kiefe, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Norman W. Weissman, University of Alabama
  • Jerome Carter, University of Alabama
  • Robert M. Centor, University of Alabama
UMMS Affiliation
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences
Date
10-3-1999
Document Type
Article
Medical Subject Headings
Clinical Medicine; *Computer User Training; Evidence-Based Medicine; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; *Information Storage and Retrieval; MEDLINE; Physicians; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Subject Headings
Abstract

The current medical environment makes information retrieval a matter of practical importance for clinicians. Many avenues present themselves to the clinician, but here we focus on MEDLINE by summarizing the current state of the art and providing an innovative approach for skill enhancement. Because new search engines appear rapidly, we focus on generic principles that can be easily adapted to various systems, even those not yet available. We propose an idealized classification system for the results of a MEDLINE search. Type A searches produce a few articles of high quality that are directly focused on the immediate question. Type B searches yield a large number of articles, some more relevant than others. Type C searches produce few or no articles, and those that are located are not germane. Providing that relevant, high-quality articles do exist, type B and C searches may often be improved with attention to search technique. Problems stem from poor recall and poor precision. The most daunting task lies in achieving the balance between too few and too many articles. By providing a theoretical framework and several practical examples, we prepare the searcher to overcome the following barriers: a) failure to begin with a well-built question; b) failure to use the Medical Subject Headings; c) failure to leverage the relationship between recall and precision; and d) failure to apply proper limits to the search. Thought and practice will increase the utility and enjoyment of searching MEDLINE.

Rights and Permissions
Citation: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Spring;15(2):281-96.
Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMed
Citation Information
Jeroan J. Allison, Catarina I. Kiefe, Norman W. Weissman, Jerome Carter, et al.. "The art and science of searching MEDLINE to answer clinical questions. Finding the right number of articles" Vol. 15 Iss. 2 (1999) ISSN: 0266-4623 (Linking)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/catarina_kiefe/40/