Skip to main content
Article
Rates of insurance for injured patients before and after health care reform in Massachusetts: a possible case of double jeopardy
UMass Center for Clinical and Translational Science Supported Publications
  • Heena Santry, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Courtney E. Collins, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Jason T. Wiseman, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Charles M. Psoinos, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Julie Flahive, University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Catarina I. Kiefe, University of Massachusetts Medical School
UMMS Affiliation
Department of Surgery; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences;Center for Outcomes Research
Date
6-1-2014
Document Type
Article
Medical Subject Headings
Adolescent; Adult; Female; Health Care Reform; Humans; Insurance, Health; Male; Massachusetts; Medically Uninsured; Middle Aged; Wounds and Injuries; Wounds, Penetrating; Young Adult
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We determined how preinjury insurance status and injury-related outcomes among able-bodied, community-dwelling adults treated at a Level I Trauma Center in central Massachusetts changed after health care reform.

METHODS: We compared insurance status at time of injury among non-Medicare-eligible adult Massachusetts residents before (2004-2005) and after (2009-2010) health care reform, adjusted for demographic and injury covariates, and modeled associations between insurance status and trauma outcomes.

RESULTS: Among 2148 patients before health care reform and 2477 patients after health care reform, insurance rates increased from 77% to 84% (P < .001). Younger patients, men, minorities, and penetrating trauma victims were less likely to be insured irrespective of time period. Uninsured patients were more likely to be discharged home without services (adjusted odds ratio = 3.46; 95% confidence interval = 2.65, 4.52) compared with insured patients.

CONCLUSIONS: Preinjury insurance rates increased for trauma patients after health care reform but remained lower than in the general population. Certain Americans may be in "double jeopardy" of both higher injury incidence and worse outcomes because socioeconomic factors placing them at risk for injury also present barriers to compliance with an individual insurance mandate.

Rights and Permissions
Citation:Am J Public Health. 2014 Jun;104(6):1066-72. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.30171 Link to article on publisher's site
Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMed
Keywords
  • UMCCTS funding
PubMed ID
24825208
Citation Information
Heena Santry, Courtney E. Collins, Jason T. Wiseman, Charles M. Psoinos, et al.. "Rates of insurance for injured patients before and after health care reform in Massachusetts: a possible case of double jeopardy" Vol. 104 Iss. 6 (2014) ISSN: 0090-0036 (Linking)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/catarina_kiefe/222/