Skip to main content
Article
“We Are Not Free”: The Meaning of in American Indian Resistance to President Johnson's War on Poverty
Communication Quarterly
  • Casey R. Kelly, Butler University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2014
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2014.922486
Abstract
This essay examines how the ideograph was crafted through dialectical struggles between Euro-Americans and American Indians over federal Indian policy between 1964 and 1968. For policymakers, was historically sutured to the belief that assimilation was the only pathway to American Indian liberation. I explore the American Indian youth movement's response to President Johnson's War on Poverty to demonstrate how activists rhetorically realigned in Indian policy with the Great Society's rhetoric of “community empowerment.” I illustrate how American Indians orchestrated counterhegemonic resistance by reframing the “Great Society” as an argument for a “Greater Indian American.” This analysis evinces the rhetorical significance of ideographic transformation in affecting policy change.
Rights

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Quarterly on 7-25-2014, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01463373.2014.922486.

Citation Information
Casey R. Kelly. "“We Are Not Free”: The Meaning of in American Indian Resistance to President Johnson's War on Poverty" Communication Quarterly Vol. 62 Iss. 4 (2014) p. 455 - 473
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/casey_kelly/18/