Skip to main content
Board size and firm performance in the property-liability insurance industry.
Faculty Publications
  • Carl J. Pacini
  • William A. Hillison
  • David C. Marlett
SelectedWorks Author Profiles:
Carl J. Pacini
Document Type
Publication Date
Date Issued
January 2008
Date Available
April 2014
Extant research on non-financial service firms indicates that board size is a key determinant of firm performance. Property-liability (P&L) insurers, however, face a different set of agency costs and a more intense regulatory environment than most non-financial firms. Both of these factors were reinforced by the implementation of the Financial Services Modernization Act in 2000. We document a significant inverse relation between publicly traded P&L insurer performance and board size in the post-Financial Services Modernization Act period. Publicly traded P&L insurer performance, measured by market-to-book ratio, return on revenues, and the operating ratio, was enhanced for firms with smaller board sizes in 2000 and 2001. Ironically, we find that publicly traded P&L insurers on average increased board size in 100 and 2001. In a post-Financial Service Modernization Act environment, board size appears to be related to publicly traded P&L insurer performance, but more research is necessary to develop a complete understanding of its role in P&L insurer corporate governance.
Abstract only. Full-text article is available only through licensed access provided by the publisher. Published in Research in Finance, 24, 249-285.
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
Citation Information
Pacini, C., Hillison, W. & Marlett, D. (2008). Board size and firm performance in the property-liability insurance industry. Research in Finance, 24, 249-285.