Skip to main content
Article
The State of Undergraduate Research Methods Training in Political Science
Political Science and Politics (2005)
  • Cameron G. Thies, University of Iowa
  • Robert E. Hogan
Abstract

Debates over methodology have long occupied a prominent role in political science and its various empirical sub-fields. Recently, these debates and occasional dialogues seem to have intensified. The Perestroika movement within APSA protested the perceived hegemony of rational choice and quantitative methods in journal publications and graduate training (Kasza 2001). Renewed attention has focused on the types of methodologies employed by studies published in the discipline's leading journals (Garand and Giles 2003; Bennett, Barth, and Rutherford 2003; Braumoeller 2003). The kinds of concerns over methodological diversity that motivate these studies also inform discussions about graduate training (Alvarez 1992; Dyer 1992; Schwartz-Shea 2003; Morrow 2003; Smith 2003).

Disciplines
Publication Date
April, 2005
Citation Information
Cameron G. Thies and Robert E. Hogan. "The State of Undergraduate Research Methods Training in Political Science" Political Science and Politics Vol. 38 Iss. 2 (2005)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/cameron_thies/23/