![](https://d3ilqtpdwi981i.cloudfront.net/Esfz-1x2wfGm25f72cZ0IKJCICw=/425x550/smart/https://bepress-attached-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/7a/63/e1/7a63e11d-1315-46fe-819b-19c1aaf093a4/thumbnail_0ff492c2-a263-4440-a8e5-484417604a87.jpg)
The "third wave" of democratization has been accompanied by the spread of new institutions that allow citizens to deliberate and decide policy outcomes. Leading international organizations, such as the World Bank and the United Nations, have disseminated "best practice" programs identified with "good government" policy reform efforts. One of the most well-known programs, Participatory Budgeting (PB), was first adopted by Brazil's Workers' Party (PT) in 1989 as a means to promote social justice, accountability, and transparency. There has been widespread adoption of PB in Brazil, led by the PT. Yet, by 2001, nearly half of PB programs had been adopted by non-PT governments. What explains why municipal governments in Brazil, especially non-PT governments, would adopt PB programs? This article estimates the probability that a municipality would adopt PB using logistic regression analysis to test a model that included electoral, economic, regional, and policy network variables. This article concludes by briefly analyzing whether governments that adopt PB are able to produce policy outcomes similar to the initial results that inspired the "best practice" label. This introduces the question: When should best practice programs be promoted for possible adoption?
This document was originally published in Opinião Público. This work is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 license. Details regarding the use of this work can be found at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. http://www.scielo.br/
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/brian_wampler/16/