Skip to main content
Article
FDR to Clinton, Mueller to ?: A Field Essay on Presidential Approval
Political Research Quarterly (2003)
  • Brian Newman, Pepperdine University
  • Paul Gronke, Reed College
Abstract

Since the 1930s, polling organizations have asked Americans whether they "approve or disapprove of the job [the incumbent] is doing as president." In the early 1970s, John Mueller started an academic industry by asking what drives these evaluations. American politics and the tools available to examine it have changed dramatically since then, inspiring a burst of research on presidential approval in the 1990s. We review this new body of literature, arguing that it builds on but differs importantly from earlier approval studies. Since Mueller's writing, scholars have expanded his relatively simple model, taking account of presidents' goals and personal characteristics, other political actors, the ubiquitous media, and an inattentive public. We describe three waves of research, focusing on the most recent wave. We suggest that history, along with new intellectual currents, data, and methods have enabled each wave to incorporate more of political, social, and psychological reality. Finally, we identify the issues most likely to motivate presidential approval research for the next ten years.

Keywords
  • Politics,
  • U.S. Presidents,
  • approval ratings,
  • John Mueller,
  • literature review
Publication Date
December, 2003
Citation Information
Brian Newman and Paul Gronke. "FDR to Clinton, Mueller to ?: A Field Essay on Presidential Approval" Political Research Quarterly Vol. 56 (2003)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/brian_newman/14/