Interpreting Acronyms and Epithets: Examining the Jurisprudential Significance (or Lack Thereof)Stanford Law & Policy Review Online (2014)
AbstractGiven the rise in short title sophistication and their prominent use as evidence in U.S. v. Windsor, this essay argues that acronym short titles are a relatively unexplored interpretive phenomenon. Examining how acronyms should be approached in jurisprudence, the essay further explains how many titles are designed around a symbolic epithet, thus calling into question the interpretative value of such titles. Additionally, the essay touches on the recent NY and D.C. decisions regarding the NSA’s bulk telephony metadata collection system, and how the USA PATRIOT acronym may have played a symbolic (psycholinguistic) role.
- public laws,
- short titles,
- USA PATRIOT Act
Publication DateMarch, 2014
Citation InformationBrian Christopher Jones. "Interpreting Acronyms and Epithets: Examining the Jurisprudential Significance (or Lack Thereof)" Stanford Law & Policy Review Online Vol. 25 (2014)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/brian_jones/18/