![](https://d3ilqtpdwi981i.cloudfront.net/PhcewNTSLU7Xxh0p-Fg3CcqAIv8=/0x0:184x238/425x550/smart/https://bepress-attached-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/f6/ca/28/f6ca2895-f4cf-45a9-8a18-858d23991e0f/187.jpg)
Feedback from lower-level employees helps upper management know when a strategy revision is necessary. Middle managers have significant control over upper management’s access to lower-level employee feedback because they decide whether to pass along that feedback when they receive it. A strategy map may help mitigate bias in these middle managers’ feedback reporting decisions. In my experiment, participants act as middle managers who receive one of two types of lower-level employee feedback: positive feedback or negative feedback. Without a strategy map, participants over-report positive feedback, under-report negative feedback, and exhibit motivated reasoning toward negative feedback. With a strategy map, participants over-report positive feedback less, under-report negative feedback at the same rate, and their motivated reasoning against negative feedback no longer affects their reporting willingness. Thus, a strategy map could help de-bias some of the feedback middle managers pass along to upper management.
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/brian-knox/16/