Skip to main content
Article
When States Die: Geographic and Territorial Pathways to State Death
Third World Quarterly (2012)
  • Brandon Valeriano, Ph.D, Seton Hall University
  • John Van Benthuysen, University of Illinois at Chicago
Abstract
State death, understood as the formal loss of control over foreign policy, is an important but neglected issue in the international relations literature. When do states die and why? How do states exit the system? The consequences of state death can be wide-ranging, from forced migration movements, regional instability, to general famine. Despite these severe consequences, political scientists have yet to adequately study the causes of state death. Fazal finds that states are prone to death when they are located as a buffer between two rivals; this suggests that being a buffer state is a cause of state death. Our expansion of current research seeks to add the concept of territorial disputes to the state death literature. We suggest that states are at greater risk of death when they become involved in territorial disputes that raise the stakes of conflict. The resulting research demonstrates that a reliable predictor of state death is engagement in a territorial dispute. Territorial disputes are the most prevalent issue that leads to war and can also be a leading cause of state death.
Publication Date
2012
DOI
10.1080/01436597.2012.691826
Citation Information
Brandon Valeriano and John Van Benthuysen. "When States Die: Geographic and Territorial Pathways to State Death" Third World Quarterly Vol. 33 Iss. 7 (2012) p. 1165 - 1189 ISSN: 1360-2241
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/brandon-valeriano/22/