A Typology of Virtual Teams: Implications for Effective Leadership
Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Retrieved [insert date], from Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations site:
Required Publisher Statement
Copyright by Sage Publishing. Final paper published as Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group and Organization Management, 27(1), 14-49.
As the nature of work in today's organizations becomes more complex, dynamic, and global, there has been an increasing emphasis on far-flung, distributed, virtual teams as organizing units of work. Despite their growing prevalence, relatively little is known about this new form of work unit. The purpose of this paper is to present a theoretical framework to focus research toward understanding virtual teams and, in particular, to identify implications for effective leadership. Specifically, we focus on delineating the dimensions of a typology to characterize different types of virtual teams. First, we distinguish virtual teams from conventional teams to identify where current knowledge applies and new research needs to be developed. Second, we distinguish among different types of virtual teams, considering the critical role of task complexity in determining the underlying characteristics of virtual teams and leadership challenges the different types entail. Propositions addressing leadership implications for the effective management of virtual teams are proposed and discussed.
Bradford S. Bell and Steve W. J. Kozlowski. "A Typology of Virtual Teams: Implications for Effective Leadership" Faculty Publications - Human Resource Studies (2002).
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/bradford_bell/12
Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Human Resources Management Commons, Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons, Other Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Strategic Management Policy Commons, Work, Economy and Organizations Commons