Skip to main content
Article
Ethical Leadership and Follower Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior: Examining the Dual Influence Mechanisms of Affective and Continuance Commitments
WCBT Faculty Publications
  • Jong Gyu Park, CUNY College of Staten Island
  • Weichun Zhu, Kean University
  • Bora Kwon, Sacred Heart University
  • Hojin Bang, Jeju National University
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
1-1-2023
Abstract

This paper aims to examine the indirect effects of ethical leadership on unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB). We primarily examine how two types of organizational commitment (i.e. affective commitment and continuance commitment) mediate the effect of the supervisors’ ethical leadership on their followers’ UPB. Collecting data from 291 employees in South Korea, at two points in time, we found that ethical leadership has a negative relationship with follower UPB through affective commitment and has a positive relationship with follower UPB through continuance commitment. Furthermore, follower organizational identification moderates the mediation processes, which makes the affective commitment-UPB relationship more negative but the continuance commitment-UPB relationship more positive when the followers more closely identify with their organization. We also discuss the theoretical contributions and practical implications.

DOI
10.1080/09585192.2023.2191209
Citation Information

Park, J. G., Zhu, W., Kwon, B., & Bang, H. (2023). Ethical leadership and follower unethical pro-organizational behavior: examining the dual influence mechanisms of affective and continuance commitments. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(22), 4313-4343. Doi: 10.1080/09585192.2023.2191209